Back to Paper

Seitdem der Full Focus Planner herausgekommen ist, arbeite ich nach dem hybriden Ansatz von Michael Hyatt. Nach dieser Wiederentdeckung von Papier, begann das Bullet Journal auf mich eine große Faszination auszuüben – und so bin ich zu Beginn der Sommerferien 2019 – trotz anfänglicher Bedenken – mit einem echten Selbstversuch gestartet.

Wie Bilbo Beutlin habe ich mein Auenland verlassen und bin aufgebrochen in das große Abenteuer. Welche Drachen habe ich getötet, welche Schätze mitgebracht?

„There …“ Bullet Journal only

Die Strukturlosigkeit des BuJo, diese individuelle Anpassbarkeit hat mich fasziniert und die Einfachheit beeindruckt:
– Keine vorgedruckten Blätter, die mir ein System aufzwangen, dem ich mich zu unterwerfen hatte.
– Keine Vorgedruckten Blätter, die mir ein schlechtes Gewissen machten, wenn ich mal ein paar Tage mit dem Schreiben aussetzte und die durch ihr Freibleiben mich stumm anklagten.
Sondern ein Notizbuch meiner Wahl, dass ich im Fluß meines Lebens frei anpassen konnte – das war zunächst eine große Bereicherung für mich Halbzeit-Zwangsneurotiker. Dennoch bin ich nach ca. 10 Wochen wieder zum hybriden FFP-Ansatz zurück gekehrt.

Gescheitert am Future Log

Bei der Vielzahl meiner Termine hatte ich schnell gemerkt, dass die schnörkellose Einfachheit des Future log nach Ryder Caroll mir nicht genügte: Statt ein halbes Jahr auf einer Doppelseite konzipierte ich ein Quartal auf eine Doppelseite mit jeweils einem kleinen Monatsübersichtskalender.

Doch auch hier hatte ich bald das Gefühl, dass ich die Übersicht verliere, da neue Termine schlicht unten angehängt werden mussten, nicht nach Datum geordnet werden konnten. Auch andere Formen des Future log habe ich probiert, wie z.B. den Calendex.

Und dann kam der Moment, als ich nach guten zwei Monaten in den Spiegel schaute und mir eingestehen musste, dass ich ohne digitale Ergänzung nicht auskomme: Durchsuchbarkeit. Sichere Aufbewahrung. Übersicht. Diese drei Eigenschaften eines digitalen Kalenders waren letztendlich – neben der Möglichkeit des Teilen von Terminen mit anderen – für mich entscheidend. Alle Termine, die ich im Daily log mit einem „\<„ ins Future Log gescheduld hatte, überführte ich wieder in meinen online-Kalender. Danach fühlte ich mich wieder besser.

„And back again“: Zurück zum hybriden Ansatz

Konsequenter Weise suchte ich dann einen Ort für meine Aufgaben, die sonst ebenfalls mit einem „\<„ im Daily Log versehen auf meinen Projektlisten im BuJo gelandet waren.
Die Logik dahinter: Alles, was in die Zukunft verschoben wird – ob Termine, terminierte Aufgaben oder weitere Aufgaben – das alles gehört in ein digitales System.

Also migrierte ich alle Projekte etc. wieder in eine App. War in den vergangenen Jahren Nozbe die App meines Vertrauens, fiel meine Wahl nun wieder auf Omnifocus. Nozbe hatte ich früher vorgezogen wegen des „Flatter is Better“-Ansatzes: Je tiefer die Verschachtelungen mit Sub-Projects, desto größer die Gefahr Wichtiges in den Tiefen des Systems zu verlieren. Damals war Nozbe meine Schaltzentrale, Übersicht war Trumpf.
Nun aber möchte ich genau das: Alles im digitalen System haben, ohne dass ich es sehe. Bzw. nur Ausgewähltes zum richtigen Zeitpunkt.
Mit der Fähigkeit Aufgaben und Projekte in die Unsichtbarkeit zu verschieben, bekam nun Omnifocus den Zuschlag – denn meine Schaltzentrale wurde wieder der Full Focus Planner von Michael Hyatt.

Meine Learnings

Was mir am BuJo gefiel

Im Rückblick betrachtet, habe ich in meinem Artikel aus Juni 2019 bereits vieles Erkannt, was sich nun als richtig herausstellte. Das ist ein gutes Gefühl.
– Dennoch: Ein bisschen trauere ich meinem kleinen und handlichen Bullet Journal etwas hinterher – der FFP hat ein deutlich größeres Format und ist dicker. Was den Formfaktor anbetrifft, gebe ich Lars Bobach nachträglich recht. Den FFP begleitende Notizbücher wie die Full Focus Notebooks können das vielleicht ausgleichen. Ein Versuch ist es wert.
– Die Implementierung eines Journals direkt im daily log nach dem Schema des 6-Minuten-Tagebuchs gefiel mir gut. Ich verwende nun wieder das Full Focus Journal, das ebenso groß ist wie der FFP, und den ich deshalb zu Hause aufbewahre. Vielleicht ist das sogar besser, als alles im BuJo zu notieren – denn wer mein BuJo hat, hat damit große Teile meines Privatlebens in der Hand.

Was nehme ich mit in die hybride Welt?

• Meiner Persönlichkeit scheint Struktur in größerem Maße gut zu tun – der FFP gibt sie mir und hilft mir durch Struktur und Layout mich klarer auf das Wichtige zu konzentrieren.
• Der FFP hat – wie auch im Interview von Mag Rattland mit John Meese aus dem Michael-Hyatt-Team viele Aspekte aus dem BuJo übernommen. Das klarer zu erkennen und deren Nutzen zu begreifen, hilft mir enorm weiter Klarheit zu erlangen – vor allem durch das Migrieren am Ende der Woche in der weekly preview, wo das Zusammenspiel von digitalem Projektmanagement-App und analogem Planungstool zum Tragen kommt: Eine Neuauflage dieses Rückrads meiner Produktivität folgt im Kürze – hier der link zu meinem früheren workflow!

In the movie „Matrix“ Morpheus tells Neo about the touchstone of wisdom:

There’s a difference between knowing the path and walking the path.

More and more i have to internalize all i’ve learned in the last year. To learn new habits. Rituals are the best ways to reprogram myself.

1.Weekly Review

The importante of this GTD-Ritual is a main insight for me. I explained my understanding of this productivity-backbone before months. To review my trusted system regulary every week remains my main task!

2.Morning Routine

Another piece of gold i found last year is my morning routine:
– to practice of good habits (e.g. healthy breakfast, meditation early in the morning)
– to reorder the tasks in Nozbe according to the places (contexts) i will be (and to redefine my context list )
– to focus on what’s really important using my personal leadership board
– NOT to begin my day checking emails

3.Evening Ritual

The evening ritual helps me to complete the day:
– writing my diary
– cleaning my inboxes (especially emails)

Conclusion

Living conditions can change.
Goals need to be readjusted.
But this I think this three points are solid stepstones on the way of life.
Or – to quote another famous movie:

The same procedure as every year!

motivation

When the first smartphones occurred in my life, I had the feeling: now I am writing emails as formerly SMS! In the beginning I found that great and was proud to answer emails directly. It flattered my ego, when I heard:

„you are so good accessible!“

But- over time this silly use of email dominated my life. All day – often before standing up in the morning – the red notifications called me:

„that’s important – read me – react – now!“

Sounds familiar? Then it’s necessary to win back your life, reject false habits and assign emails the place they belong to!
A sentence at the beginning of the worth reading book by Klaus Raab „we are online – where are you?“ woke me up:

emails – the pneumatic post system of modern communication, because it‘s no communication in real time …

Wow! I was caught in the wrong beliefs – wrong beliefs nurtured by the expectations of my profession:

wrong beliefs: reachable – available

The pastor is always at work – and always reachable!
This sentence I heard in my professional training. It leads to a fundermantal misunderstanding.  reachable does not mean available! 
– if someone sends me an email, it reaches me through my email-inbox: I was reachabel.
– if someone calls me and speaks on my voice mail, he has me reached.
– if someone sends me a message – an SMS, a WhatsApp or by faceook-messanger – then this message reaches me.
 Availability is something else: I’m available, if it‘s possible for me to take up the phone, when my phone rings. 
Emails the other hand reach me. They must not immediately be answered. Emails are like letters reaching me by post. The short „checking“ of emails will cost me only unnecessarily time and energy – I do not look every 30 minutes to my mailbox at home.

the medium is the message

It’s my duty as pastor to be reachable and to respond in a reasonable period. The period based on the communication channel, which is used:
– calls: like Face-to-Face-communication – probably the matter is urgently! If e.g. a undertaker needs my feedback to nail a Date for a funeral, he calls me.
– short messages: short messages work in real time too – but in my experience they are rarely really urgent.
– emails: because email communication is no communication in Real Time, they can actually never be urgent. Unfortunately they are often used for urgent affairs. Colleagues, looking urgently for a substitute, questions unfortunately often by email other colleagues – probably because with an email at the same time several pastors can be achieved simultanely.
– letters: letters can never be urgently. A letter needs maximum three days to arrive.

These days, you don’t have to treat emails like traditional letters. Every recipient cares only about the concrete information, not the background noise that simply hampers their efforts of getting to the chase. #10stepsbook

differentiation the communication channels: changing habits

To regain my life again. Not to get dictated from the flut of information, what ist now urgent. I do need to develop new habits. But first i have to clarify what significance what kind of communication has:
– telephone calls have for me high priority. I go immediately to the ringing telephone – or as soon as I have free time, for example directly after a conversation I check my mailbox and call back.
– email: can not be urgent. the multiple „check“ of emails on the smartphone fills my head only with unnecessary information to which I can not respond appropriately. Therefore i reserve 2-3 periods a day in which i process emails: at the later morning (after i did my Big Rocks), in the afternoon (precaution: maybe somebody used an email for „urgent things“) and evening as part of my evening-ritual (to make sure i can sleep).
 That way i determine the time emails get – and will not from the emails determined!

processing emails: switch in the email mode

email – ready – go: inbox zero

In the film „over the top“ the trucker Lincoln Hawk before his competitions brings himselfe in the right mental moode for it by turning his cap backwards: this ritual transformed him in a maschine. The same way we can process emails:

it’s evening. the work is done  now , it is time to process the emails!
In the next hour i’ll do nothing else – only achieve my goal: Inbox Zero! I follow the same system, i always follow – the „getting-things-done method“ (GTD) of David Allen. Processing emails follows the same rules as the „processing“ any other inbox:

1. rule: top down – touch it once

I start top-down: I do not glance through nor go at wish. I deal with each mail only a single time and decide what to do next.

2. rule: what is it-decision -2 minutes per mail

Tell yourselfe the basic question:  requires this email an action of mine? The following responses to an email requires less than 2-minutes – you can  immediately  do it:
 1.no
– it’s spam or other email garbage?? then off in the  spam / trash folder!
– it is a info-mail, a Newsfeed or something like this? Normally appropriate filters can avoid that these type of mail get into here! You can read this information later, because they are not urgent. Do you work with an email folder system, move this type of mail in the folder „reading later“. I prefer Evernote, there these mails goes – i deal with this kind of information, when i have time – in the waiting room at the doctor, on a train ride, …  someday / maybe .
 2.yes 
– I can answer a email immediately, within two minutes, then do it now. Briefly – I write no novels.
– Or I forward / delegate : a question for a baptizism – and i‘m not responsible? I redirect to the competent colleagues – that is not my project!
– The email applies to one of my projects, but i can do nothing: I forward the mail to the competent person – with „BCC“ -kopie to my GTD app Nozbe. There this request becomes a part of the corresponding project with the context „waiting for“ + „name of the responsible person“ so that I keep track. During the weekly review i will meet this task again.

3. if it takes longer … into the „trusted system“!

If an email relates to one of my own projects, it can become „reference material“ – and will stored in Evernote¹. Requires the email from me one or more actions, i will transform the mail to a task of an existing project or the topic of the email will become a project themselfe:
3.1 the email concerns me directly and belongs to an existing project: 
I send this type of email per nozbe-email-adress to my GTD system, add the context and possibly the due date. The email client i use generates a link for each email so it’s possible to store this link together with the email text in my GTD program: so I can answer the email interacting nozbe and email client easily: the link turns me to the correct email in the archive folder. During my weekly review i will meet this task again.
3.2 the email concerns me directly, but i’ve still no existing project:
I mail this email to my GTD app, there the mail becomes a new project. Alternative: I sent the email to Evernote and use it as a reference material – in Nozbe i can generate a project out of the Evernote-Note and the related tasks. My GTD app nozbe has – as well as Evernote – an email address.

developing new habits

1. Make an appointment with yourself at which times you want to process emails a day.  two to three periods  should totally suffice. Stick to this appointment! This helps:
2. Delete the email app from your smartphone! Or less radically: move the email app from the home screen out of visibility – and  turn off the notifications as well as the news-push.
3. Check no emails – process them as described above.  processing: touch it once! 
4. Largest reward: more time for your important things!  If you notice that your new approach helps you to gain more time for your really important things – this will motivate you to stick with your new email habits.
   Here you will find a summary as nozbe-how template.

weekly review matters!

A friend of mine from the computer science industry once said:

shit in, shit out. As simple as that!
In fact:
– I do not care for my system, I do not trust the system.
– and: if I do not think at least a week in advance, I will sink in the stress of everyday life.
So every week a do it again:
– I look back at the last week: is there anything i missed?
– A Check my Waiting-for-list: did not someone contact me in time?
– I look forword on the next two weeks in advance (these projects come on top of my nozbe-labeled list „Big Rocks“).
– I look on on my personal-leadership-board to focus on my goals – the other side of my Big Rocks
– i review my project-list: is everything finde?
– at last my my someday-maybe-list: can i do something new?
Think once a week – so I do not have to think about it during the coming week!
If you don’t regularly review your system, tasks, projects and goals, you’ll quickly start drifting aimlessly reacting only to what others have planned for you.“

Or: How to take control over my documents

Once upon a time – i filled many file folders with paper … Did i ever look anything up of it?
I once asked the secretary of my bureau, what she do with the letters from the Church Office. „I put them in the folder“. – „If you are looking for this letter, how do you do it? Or is the letter just gone?“ – „Mh – it’s just gone.“
An honest answer. So i stick to my practice which i develop as a habit for several years now – and scan …
As i wrote in an earlier post, i have at any time everything with me what i may need. And i’m able to find in a very short amount of time what i need. That why i scan everything!

“Make a digital copy of all of the most important ones that you don’t want to lose or can still come in handy.“ #10stepsbook

office equipment and work flow

All i need is a document scanner and/or smartphone and an paper based filesystem A-Z.

use of document scanner and/or smartphone

I scan all my papers. The best day of my life was when i bought a document scanner. I remove the clips and the scanner scans front and back of a paper in a breeze. I use my smartphone to do the scan-job, if it is a book or something else i mustn’t destroy.
The scanned papers i take once a week to the office to the paper shredder – done!

Evernote or iCloud or Nozbe

I save the scans as searchable pdf. The file name begins with the date in the form: YYYY-MM-DD and normally i save this file in Evernote. Because my digital GTD-Manager Nozbe integrates with Evernote, i can use this pdf as reference material for a task or a project. Evernote has this amazing text search.
Very sensitive data i save in iCloud or even better in Nozbe because of its very heavy encryption.

contracts etc.

Only very few papers i archive in my A to Z file folder system. Follow the recommendation of David Allen to use these file folders i can simply fill without punching etc. Because if it’s not simple, it will take too longe time to maintain the archive.

the disadvantage: „what do we actually have…“

If you have everything at hand at any time and any place – your are a desired person. The danger is that your colleagues rely on you – that’s a burden and a joy 😉

The using of contexts is one of the main differences between David Allens „Getting Things Done“ (GTD) and a common taskmanagementsystem. Contexts – or in a wider definition categories – prepare you to do the tasks through batching similar tasks throughout all projects.

“Categories are like having an extra weapon in your armory – they allow you to group tasks from different projects…“ #10stepsbook
What are these mysterious weapons?

What are contexts?

Projectlists are fine to gain an overview of your plans and commitments during the weekly review. But contexts let you come in a specifically mood oder situation, where you can do a specific sort of tasks.

GTD-Gamechanger-Methode

Contexts are discrete categories, which divide your great amount of tasks, so that you can really do them. According to David Allen is a context necessary tool, situation or person to do a task.

First Step of deciding what to do next

Consequentialy this is the first step to decide, what to do next. With a spade you cannot write an letter, nor with a pencil dig over your garden. Only when you have the right tool etc. right at hand, then you can do the job!
So the other criterias to decide what to do next, depend on the right context: Your amount of time – your energy level and at least your priorities. All starts with the fit to the right context.

development of contexts

So far so good – seems simple – but is it really?

Clearly distinctions till the 90s

In the former times you went to your workplace to do your job. Back at home you were private and/ or a family person. In that way the context were distinguished: At the computer in the bureau you could do your work. At home you could write – even on your personal computer – private letters and so on.

confusions through the smartphone-revolution

Today everything has changed because of the smartphone-revolution: we can e.g. write emails everywhere – even business or private ones. Today we are always online – we do not need to go to a specific place, to a computer connected with the internet.
The fact of this causes us to rethink the use of contexts. Here is my try:

How i use contexts

I’m experimenting with contexts for years how my context settings suited best to my life:

Tools and technology

I use the category „technology“ to do all the tasks I need a computer for: All what can i do with my smartphone, tablet or stationary computer.
Still i use the category „phone calls“ and „email“ yet to differenciate these tasks, because of their specific character: Phone calls can i do during car driving (with a headset of course) or when i have only a few minutes befor the next meeting. For processing emails i have reserved a few periods a day, when i want process them (not check!).

moods

Contexts also stand for a certain state of mind: When i want process my emails, i go in the email-processing-mood. Same with taking calls.
Thats why i have contexts defined for specific moods like „thinking“ or „reading/reviewing“.

Places

Places have still a importance: Some tasks i can only do in the “bureau“, others at „home“ or while “purchasing“.

Persons

If i meet colleagues, it is useful to know what i have to discuss or clarify with them. So for important persons in my job or private life i have a context with their „name“. Have i tasks delegated to someone else, i add the category „waiting for“ to this task – fortunately my GTD-software Nozbe allows me to give a task more than one context. For this example the name of the person in combination with „waiting for“.

Meetings

In my professional life meetings have an important role. Therefore all my tasks have the context of this type of meeting with them where i have this manner to discuss:
– Meeting with my pastor colleagues
– Presbyterium (the leading organ of a parish)
– committees
– groups like the visiting service and so on
The task gets the date of the meeting where i have to discuss this topic – very helpful to structure the themes of meetings which reoccuer regularily.

MITs

My most important tasks i want to complete today get the „MIT“-category. In Nozbe i can filter my priority list so that i can see these 1-3 MITs only – until i’ve completed them. I assign these category during my morning routine.

Conclusion

Thats the overview of my category-settings.
I experimented even with „Energy levels“ according to Sven Fechner which i added additionally to my tasks – but i found this a step to much, because i want define my tasks as easy as possible.
Contexts still are the weapon to get your stuff done. But a rethinking if your defined contexts still fit to your needs is necessary from time to time.